A review of the news summary content reveals that the government has proposed a draft ‘National Commitment Charter’ by consolidating the election manifestos of six political parties represented in parliament. The draft suggests transforming Nepal from a ‘buffer state’ to a ‘vibrant bridge,’ a proposal that has sparked controversy. Diplomatic experts argue that the term ‘buffer state’ does not align with Nepal’s sovereignty and foreign policy and have recommended its removal.
April 15, Kathmandu – The government recently unveiled a draft of the ‘National Commitment Charter,’ integrating the election manifestos, pledges, and commitments of six parliamentary parties. The document has been open for public feedback for 10 days. One phrase in section 14 of the draft has drawn significant attention in political and diplomatic circles: the term ‘buffer state.’
Under the heading ‘International Relations and Diplomacy,’ the draft proposes transforming Nepal from a ‘buffer state’ to a ‘vibrant bridge.’ It states, “While prioritizing Nepal’s sovereignty and national interests, Nepal will be transformed from a ‘buffer state’ into a ‘vibrant bridge,’ ensuring national interests through trilateral economic partnerships and connectivity. This will establish Nepal as an independent, neutral, non-aligned nation grounded in world peace on the international stage.”
Although appealing, experts question the diplomatic appropriateness of officially referring to Nepal as a ‘buffer state’ in a formal government document. Professor Dr. Khadga KC, an expert in diplomacy and international relations, remarks, “Nepal has never been a buffer state. Therefore, including such a term in the government’s preliminary draft was inappropriate.”
Geopolitical analyst Chandra Dev Bhatt echoes this concern, stating, “Referencing ‘buffer state’ in official documents is unusual. It raises doubts about Nepal’s sovereignty and risks portraying the nation as weak.”
