Skip to main content

Gen Z Movement in Nepal: Commission Recommends Action, Could Balen Face Trouble?

The National Human Rights Commission is set to recommend government action next week regarding the implementation of the report by the commission formed to investigate the Gen Z movement. According to Lili Thapa, chairperson and member of the investigative committee, the commission will recommend action to the government on Wednesday, April 29 (Baisakh 16). “On the same day, the commission will hold a press conference to release a summary of the report,” Thapa said. The recommendations target individuals involved in the police crackdown on September 9 (Bhadra 23) and subsequent destructive incidents on September 10 (Bhadra 24).

Recommendations also include accountability for political and administrative leadership. Responding to questions, Commission member Thapa stated, “The report addresses who is responsible for the events of both days, and the recommendations are based on these findings.” Previously, the commission led by former Special Court Chief Gauribahadur Karki was criticized for inadequate investigation into those involved in the incidents on September 10.

The commission has also studied the role of the current Prime Minister and former Kathmandu Metropolitan City Chief, Balendra Shah, popularly known as ‘Balen.’ An official pointed out, “His name appears in connection with the events on the 10th as well as prior incidents, and discussions from Discord chats have been included in the investigation summary.” According to commission officials, leaders including Balen and Ravi Lamichhane have been recommended for action from a human rights perspective. However, an official also indicated that the commission might not fully endorse the report.

The prospect of recommending action against the current Prime Minister Balen has sparked debate on what could follow if such a measure is implemented. Constitutional expert Surya Dhungel noted that if serious allegations arise, further investigation might be warranted. “When serious questions are raised regarding individuals holding various responsibilities, their responses and information will be crucial,” he said.