Prime Minister Walendra Shah’s Government Decides to Dismiss Hundreds of Politically Appointed Officials: Objectives and Potential Impact
The government led by Prime Minister Walendra Shah has sparked widespread discussion by deciding to remove hundreds of officials holding political appointments simultaneously from their positions. Experts have warned that this move could have both positive and negative consequences in the future. A legal scholar and professor cautioned that this practice could increase the risk of excessive use of ordinances going forward. Prime Minister’s press and research advisor Deepa Dahal revealed plans for future appointments to be made through open competition and based on merit.
Following the cabinet’s recommendation on Saturday, President Ramchandra Paudel issued the ‘Special Ordinance on the Dismissal of Public Officials, 2083,’ which will lead to the simultaneous dismissal of hundreds of politically appointed officials. According to the Prime Minister’s Office, a total of 1,594 officials holding political appointments across various boards, committees, and institutions will be removed.
Analysts note that the practice of making politically favorable appointments continues with the arrival of a new government. According to public administration expert Kashiraj Dahal, the current government may have felt compelled to take this dismissive step due to the underperformance of previous politically appointed officials. “The government has introduced a governance reform agenda. It appears the decision to use an ordinance for dismissals stems from fears that these individuals may not provide adequate support or might refuse cooperation,” Dahal explained. He added, “The government likely aims to streamline the existing administrative system.” Another stated objective is to bring in qualified and capable individuals through competitive recruitment in future appointments. Government officials have also publicly conveyed this intention. However, issuing an ordinance without a sitting parliament and holding a two-thirds majority government has drawn criticism from opposition parties.
Experts have underscored that this decision could have both beneficial and adverse effects. “Future governments might continue this precedent or appoint qualified and capable personnel as needed,” said administration specialist Dahal. Political analyst Koirala anticipated an increase in political appointments whenever a new government comes to power. “This process could create a distortion whereby individuals—regardless of their qualifications or competence—can be removed by a subsequent government,” he stated. Law lecturer Bipin Adhikari emphasized that ordinances should be used only under compelling circumstances. “The current use does not conform to standard procedures. Laws must be enacted transparently and should not be overlooked,” he asserted.
