Sushila Karki Criticizes Appointment of Dr. Manoj Sharma as Chief Justice, Citing Preference for Justice Sapana Pradhan Malla

Former Prime Minister and Chief Justice Sushila Karki has expressed that the appointment of Dr. Manoj Sharma, who was fourth in seniority, as Chief Justice was incorrect. Karki emphasized that the most senior judge, Justice Sapana Pradhan Malla, was fully capable and that the government’s decision to block a female Chief Justice was a mistake. She stated that judicial appointments should be based on merit and highlighted that Sapana Pradhan Malla played a key role in laws related to women. April 7, Kathmandu.
Following the Constitutional Council’s recommendation on Thursday to appoint Dr. Manoj Sharma as Chief Justice, Sushila Karki voiced serious disagreement. In a conversation, she expressed anger that the government disregarded legal procedures and customs by appointing the judge ranked fourth in seniority. According to her, the most senior and competent judge, Sapana Pradhan Malla, who has also served as acting Chief Justice among all previous Chief Justices, was the rightful candidate.
“In history, where has there been a more qualified and capable woman? What was lacking in her?” Karki questioned. She warned that the government will have to face consequences for this decision. She labeled the blocking of a highly qualified and capable woman as a government error, adding that the current administration will bear the repercussions.
“The state has three institutions, each with its own prestige and seriousness. How do appointments occur in the police? Candidates are selected carefully and promoted over time. Even a soldier rises through promotions,” she explained. “Judicial appointments follow a similar promotion process. Even appointments to the Supreme Court should be merit-based. If a candidate lacks qualifications, they can be dropped.” Karki recalled that during her tenure as Chief Justice, it was reported that she was the third woman Chief Justice worldwide, and criticized the current government for making this decision without thoughtful consideration.
“Justice Sapana Pradhan Malla is not an unqualified person. She has practiced law extensively and has advocated between INGOs and NGOs. She has also contributed to law-making,” Karki said. She added that individuals like Sapana Pradhan Malla have played a crucial role in advancing women-related legislation in the country.




