Local Representatives in Sudurpashchim Discuss Changes to Number and Boundaries of Local Governments
April 9, Doti. Following the federal government’s release of a preliminary draft proposing new standards for adjusting the number and boundaries of rural municipalities, municipalities, and wards, intense debate has erupted on the topic. Local representatives in Sudurpashchim Province have expressed varied reactions to the government’s draft.
Susila Shahi, Mayor of Lamkichuha Municipality in Kailali, emphasized the necessity of modifying the number and boundaries of local governments but insisted that such decisions require detailed study. “The boundary demarcations made during restructuring were not accurate,” Shahi stated. “In some settlements, ward offices are not easily accessible, while residents of others have difficulty reaching the municipality offices. Improvements are essential.” She also highlighted the need to upgrade certain rural municipalities to municipality status. Overall, she supports reducing the total number of local governments. “Most fundamental services are delivered through ward offices. Increasing ward numbers while decreasing local government units would enhance practicality,” she explained.
Sher Singh Parki, Chairperson of Alital Rural Municipality in Dadeldhura, does not consider an immediate change in the number and boundaries appropriate. According to him, “Considering development, public accessibility, and geographical distances, it is not suitable to hastily alter boundaries.” He supports increasing the number of wards further and believes local government units should not be reduced or merged based solely on population.
Mahavir Bohara, Chairperson of Saipal Rural Municipality in Bajhang, stressed that changes to the number and boundaries should take geographical distance and development status into account. “If the decision is based only on low population, citizens will face significant difficulties accessing services,” Bohara warned.
Santosh Prakash Joshi, Chairperson of Dilasaini Rural Municipality in Baitadi, acknowledged the necessity for changes but cautioned against rushing the decision. “Local governments need thorough discussion on this issue, and expert committees should conduct comprehensive consultations,” he said. Umesh Prasad Bhatt, Chairperson of Ajaymeru Rural Municipality in Dadeldhura, expressed disagreement with the draft standards, stating, “Altering the number and boundaries without including local leaders in the study committee is not feasible.”
Jaman Singh Dhami, Chairperson of Marma Rural Municipality in Darchula, pointed out the need to resolve boundary inconsistencies and geographic mismatches from the previous local government restructuring. “Many areas have boundary disputes between municipalities, and numerous settlements find it difficult to receive services from their ward or municipality offices. These issues must be addressed,” he explained.
Meanwhile, Durgadatta Ojha, Chairperson of Jorayal Rural Municipality in Doti, argued that restructuring is not currently required. “The present system has not even completed ten years, and major work remains unfinished. Significant funds have already been spent on infrastructure like offices. Basic sectors such as education, health, and transportation require more development,” he said. According to Ojha, the current number and boundaries should remain unchanged for at least the next 20 years to focus on development efforts.
