Skip to main content

‘A Fistful of Clouds’ Portrays the Conflict Between Women’s Freedom and Social Norms

‘A Fistful of Clouds’ vividly depicts the tension between women’s independence and societal expectations within a middle-class Nepali family. The film’s protagonist, Maily, expresses dissatisfaction with her family and future husband, seeking personal freedom. Maily stands at a pivotal point in her life. While her marriage is being registered at Ward No. 11 office, her father and prospective husband smile as they read a letter sent by the ward secretary. Although the prospective husband is eager to follow the ward secretary’s instructions, Maily is reluctant to stamp the letter or listen to the secretary’s words. Mentally detached from the situation, no happiness is visible on Maily’s face; she only smiles when she is alone in her car, away from her fiancé. At the ward office, her attention drifts elsewhere, and her fiancé had not invited her there. After office hours, two cars of different colors depart in separate directions, only after which Maily smiles. This opening sets the stage for ‘A Fistful of Clouds,’ a story about a middle-class Nepali family that functions as both a family drama and a feminist film.

Before discussing the film’s themes, its title itself offers symbolic insight. ‘A Fistful of Clouds’ is poetic and metaphorical. The film’s writer/director, Sahara Sharma, clarifies its meaning: “What dreams are women in our society allowed to see? Are they allowed to hold onto their dreams or not?” It is impossible to grasp clouds in one’s fist permanently; even if held, clouds are fleeting. The film attempts to raise these questions through its narrative revealed via Maily’s life. Maily is an educated young woman who has returned from the United States. America is depicted as a representation of the middle-class family’s aspirations. Her relationship with her family is average—not exceptionally good nor very bad. However, she questions both written and unwritten family rules. She detests the differential treatment her parents give to her brother compared to her.

The film also raises a critical question: Can traditional cultural values provide mental peace to the new generation? The male characters and Maily hold opposing views. The men embody patriarchal thinking, while Maily seeks personal freedom. She also rejects economic disparity. Maily’s family lives in a Terai village, whereas the men’s family resides in Kathmandu. While pursuing her individual freedom, the film explores how this quest fits or conflicts with her sister, brother, mother, father, and other relatives. However, Maily’s family does not fully represent the entirety of the middle-class Nepali family experience. Instead, this film strives to depict the complex transitional phase of Nepali society. The director’s courageous choice to develop the film in a fresh style is commendable.