A review of the news summary was conducted. The government’s smartness should not be limited to gaining attention on social media but must be evident through policy, regulations, and implementation. We now live in an era of instant responses, where instant coffee and instant noodles exemplify the demand for quick reactions and prompt actions. On Ashar 24, 2083 (July 9, 2026), Ganesh Nepali, a rider driver, attempted self-immolation in front of the Passport Department. He died during treatment on Ashar 25. He represents many others — workers dispersed across market squares, alleys, factories, restaurants, hotels, shops, and showrooms. Today’s government prioritizes swift action, emphasizing rapid planning, quick execution, fast enforcement, and accelerated development. It functions much like “Instant and Instant Pvt. Ltd.” In some instances, however, a pause or slower pace is necessary — a deliberate, measured approach. For example, patients with burns require rapid yet sensitive treatment. The current state of hospitals and burn care specialists in Nepal calls for serious reflection.
Turning to specific issues, an almond in a snack set was found to contain insects, resulting in the business’s closure and millions in fines. Fish bones were discovered in an omelet, attracting similar penalties. These incidents sparked debates and trending discussions on social media. While strict enforcement prompts swift responses, when disciplining businesses, factors such as the nature of the offense, operational costs, and the impact of penalties on livelihoods must be considered. Only then can equitable decisions be made.
Regarding hygiene, what is the status of the country’s stable water supply? What conditions do workers at these establishments endure? How are employees affected when businesses face penalties? These issues demand thorough examination and careful analysis. In well-known restaurants in Kathmandu, the negative odor on workers’ faces can be detected even before tasting the food. Why is this the case? Reflect on this question personally. The government imposes hefty fines and shuts down industries, and the public supports these measures. However, it is essential to also consider the welfare of the workers. This does not imply avoiding penalties; enforcement must occur. Yet, actions should be taken with consideration of the broader effects and future consequences.
Though the government has changed, many decisions remain the same. Issues such as public welfare, poverty, farmers’ hardships, damaged infrastructure, economic slowdown, unemployment, water scarcity in Kathmandu, and the budget are longstanding concerns. Being smart entails more than style, behavior, or speed; simplicity can also embody smartness, as history demonstrates. Government smartness must manifest through sound policies, laws, and plans. To build a smart nation, it is ineffective for ministers to run around, consult ChatGPT, pressure entrepreneurs, or hit contractors. Lifting squatters from slums to residential areas, suppressing employees, stirring up social media, using abusive language, or applauding will not solve problems.
Smartness stems from methodology, process, and implementation outcomes. To reach the moon, a rocket is needed; an airplane cannot suffice. Thinking one can reach Jogthala Gaad running is folly. Considering our current national conditions and potential, we should not place excessive expectations on the government, nor should the government harbor high expectations. Instead, let us strive to enhance discussions, making them more comprehensive and sensitive without rushing in the pursuit of rapid action.
