US lawmakers have sharply criticized China’s growing presence at the United Nations, accusing it of using peacekeeping forces as a tool for espionage. Mike Waltz, the US Ambassador to the UN, expressed concerns that Chinese peacekeepers may be advancing the interests of the Chinese Communist Party. In Congress, fierce debates unfolded between Republican and Democratic lawmakers over the UN budget and ongoing military tensions with Iran. 7th Shrawan, Kathmandu. American legislators have voiced criticism over China’s expanding role at the United Nations, labeling it as an instrument for espionage. Meanwhile, a hearing on economic matters related to the UN took place in Congress, which escalated into a heated debate over the war initiated by President Donald Trump against Iran.
During the House Foreign Affairs Committee session in Washington, Republican Representative Sherry Biggs from South Carolina shared her views. She stated, “China’s peacekeeping department strategically targets sensitive regions, including corridors related to the Belt and Road Initiative, ports, and areas near mineral resources. These regions also lie close to existing or potential military base locations.” She added, “There remains longstanding concern whether this move serves as a cover for fulfilling military and intelligence objectives in areas critical to US strategic interests.”
US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz spoke about the Chinese Peacekeeping Forces, noting, “Compared to other member states, the Chinese peacekeepers are better equipped and better prepared for UN missions. However, I do not believe they are being used as eyes and ears on the ground for the Chinese Communist Party.”
Waltz further commented, “Our Chinese counterparts on the Security Council generally cooperate. Still, there remains the possibility that they pursue dual objectives. We are very cautious in this regard.” He also noted that the administration has repeatedly blocked China’s attempts to undermine Taiwan’s role at the UN.
A former Republican lawmaker from Florida stated, “We have consistently opposed such actions. As US policy, we are fighting for Taiwan’s participation in UN bodies.” Meanwhile, most Republican legislators criticized the UN, questioning its capability and track record in preventing wars.
Waltz, who previously served as national security advisor to Trump but was dismissed due to a leak involving sensitive information in the journalism field, emphasized the necessity of the UN as a platform for global dialogue. He said, “If we had not established this institution, others would have.”
Waltz added, “I do not want to see the UN become a tool for Beijing or Brussels.” The Chinese Embassy in Washington responded to these claims by calling them unfounded. A spokesperson said, “Countries make independent decisions within the UN based on the merits of each case and their national interests.”
On Wednesday, a former US Special Forces officer also faced criticism amid the controversy over the war with Iran. The administration’s lack of transparency has exacerbated the dispute. Democratic Representative Sara Jacobs from San Diego questioned Waltz sharply, asking whether Americans are safe since Trump initiated the war.
Waltz replied, “Yes, the world and the American people are safer. Without Iran possessing nuclear weapons, Americans are in a better position.” Praising Trump, he said, “Trump has strengthened American security.” According to reports, Trump coordinated with Israel to carry out an airstrike in Iran at the end of February.
Waltz referred to Trump as the “Peace President” and described the UN as a platform that helps America maintain peace, share burdens, and advance the America First policy. Jacobs immediately responded, “We are clearly not in a good place. This administration has requested an additional $8.7 billion from Congress to fund the costs of this war.”
