April 14, Kathmandu – A boat traveling from Bangladesh to Malaysia capsized in the Andaman Sea, located on the eastern coast of the Indian Ocean, resulting in 250 people reported missing. According to the United Nations Refugee and Migration Agency, the victims are Rohingya and Bangladeshi nationals. The boat, primarily used for fishing, was en route from Bangladesh towards Malaysia.
Reports indicate that the boat sank due to strong winds, rough sea conditions, and overcapacity. The Bangladesh Coast Guard informed AFP news agency on April 9 that one of their vessels had rescued nine survivors from the incident. The exact date of the accident remains unclear.
The Rohingya are an ethnic minority from Myanmar who fled in large numbers following a violent crackdown in 2017. Myanmar, whose majority population is Buddhist, does not grant citizenship to Rohingya Muslims. Due to dire conditions in Bangladesh, many Rohingya have undertaken dangerous sea journeys to reach Malaysia.
One of the rescued individuals, Rafiqul Islam, recounted surviving nearly 36 hours adrift before being rescued. The 40-year-old traveled in pursuit of employment opportunities in Malaysia, despite the risks involved.
US President Donald Trump has hinted that talks with Iran aimed at ending hostilities could resume later this week.
After talks held in Pakistan last week failed, the United States imposed a blockade on Iranian ports.
“We will have to stay there (in Islamabad). Something might happen within the next two days, and we are eager for that,” Trump told the New York Post in an interview.
Trump’s remarks came as the US military reported that within 24 hours of the blockade’s start, no ships had entered or exited Iranian ports.
As the US and Iran face each other again, doubts have emerged about the future of the two-week ceasefire scheduled to begin next week.
According to Trump, the Iranian side has not yet responded. However, UN Secretary-General António Guterres has stated that the possibility of talks resuming is “high.”
US Strategy to Keep Economic Pressure on Iran
Image source, EPA/Shutterstock
Citing Gulf States, Pakistan, and Iranian officials, Reuters reports that negotiating teams from Washington and Tehran may return to Pakistan this week, though dates have yet to be finalized.
With hopes of renewed diplomatic efforts, crude oil prices fell below $100 per barrel in global markets on Tuesday.
Following airstrikes by the US and Israel on Iran on February 28, Iran has effectively nearly closed the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil and gas transportation.
After the failure of initial talks in Islamabad, over a dozen US warships and nearly 10,000 American troops have blockaded Iranian ports and barred ships of all nations. This blockade aims to exert economic pressure on Iran.
This move is believed to impact Iran’s two main sources of income—oil exports and transit fees collected via maritime routes.
US Conditions for Negotiations
Image source, EPA/Shutterstock
Within 24 hours after the blockade began, six commercial ships complied with US military directives and returned from Iranian ports, according to US Central Command.
Analysis shows at least four vessels linked to Iran crossed the Strait of Hormuz during the blockade period; two of these ships had previously docked at Iranian ports.
Since the blockade started Monday, three non-Iranian affiliated vessels have also transited the strait.
The US blamed Iran for the failure of the first phase of talks in Islamabad, claiming Iran refused to agree to any conditions.
The most contentious issue was Iran’s nuclear program. US officials stated that they demanded a halt on uranium enrichment for at least 20 years.
However, sources report Iran offered only a five-year freeze, according to US negotiators.
Israel and Lebanon Hold Direct Talks After Three Decades
Image source, Getty Images
For the first time in three decades, Israel and Lebanon have engaged in direct talks and agreed to continue further discussions.
The US State Department spokesperson confirmed that the time and place for further talks are yet to be decided.
Lebanese representatives in Washington described the talks as constructive, while the Iranian side also reported positive dialogue.
However, there is no ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon’s Hezbollah during these talks. Iran insists on Hezbollah’s disarmament, while Hezbollah has refused to participate in the talks.
Our news content is also available on our YouTube channel. To subscribe and watch videos click here. We are active on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter as well. The BBC Nepali Service program airs daily at 8:45 PM on radio.
Photo Credit: Prepared following a summary of United Nations news. April 15 has been designated by the UN General Assembly as International Health Day. Starting this year, Nepal has proposed observing International Health Day across various countries worldwide. The day aims to inspire everyone to adopt affordable, accessible, and inclusive health practices. Kathmandu, 2 Baisakh. International Health Day is being observed today through various programs. From this year onward, led by Nepal, this day is being celebrated in multiple countries globally. The UN General Assembly declared April 15 as International Health Day to promote overall health, happiness, and a balanced lifestyle. The proposal to observe this health day annually was put forth by Nepal and approved by the General Assembly on 26 Falgun last year. The primary goal of this day is to motivate people towards adopting affordable, accessible, and inclusive health practices.
International Health Day is expected to make a significant contribution not only in treatment after illness but also in preventive measures, fostering a healthy lifestyle, people-centered health systems that save lives, reducing health expenditures, and controlling preventable diseases. The United Nations acknowledges the importance of indigenous peoples’ cultures, local communities’ traditions, and traditional knowledge, emphasizing that evidence-based traditional medical practices can strengthen health systems and promote overall health. According to the UN, this day aims to raise global public awareness, provide a platform for cultural exchange, and facilitate knowledge sharing. Various programs are also being organized as part of these celebrations. Highlighting the importance of individual health, happiness, and overall well-being, the UN has noted that previously declared international days such as International Day of Happiness (March 20), International Yoga Day (June 21), and World Meditation Day (December 21) also contribute to promoting holistic health.
Health is placed as a top priority under the third Sustainable Development Goal, aiming to ensure healthy lives for all age groups. Key priorities include maternal and child health, control of communicable and non-communicable diseases, access to essential medicines and vaccines, promotion of mental health, and reduction of health inequalities.
The government led by the Rastriya Swatantra Party has presented a 100-day digital agenda aiming to establish a new model of transparency and technology-driven good governance. The plan includes granting legal recognition to the Citizen App, making all government certificates available online, and implementing the Digital Nepal Framework 2.0. Although a $90 million digital transformation project approved by the World Bank and Asian Development Bank remains unimplemented and cybersecurity remains weak, the digital transformation program of Nepal—long limited to slogans—is now entering the phase of execution.
The current government, led by the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP), has proposed the 100-day digital agenda focusing on transparency, accountability, and technology-based governance, signaling the creation of a new operational model for the state. Under Balen Shah’s leadership, the government appears to have been given a mandate by the public—especially the Gen Z generation—to eliminate corruption, facilitate service delivery, and build a digital Nepal. According to this policy framework, the concept of “not line but online” is set to be put into practice.
Presently, Nepal has laid the foundation for digital infrastructure — with over 24 million mobile banking users, more than 16 million national ID card applications, and over 1.5 million users on the Citizen App serving as evidence. However, the main challenge lies not in technology but in weak implementation. Many government offices still do not fully accept digital documents, large numbers of ID cards remain undelivered, and incomplete digital service systems have undermined public trust. Within the first 15 days, the government plans to grant legal recognition to the Citizen App via a cabinet decision, enable online downloading of all government certificates, and implement Digital Nepal Framework 2.0.
This initiative is expected to liberate citizens from the burden of standing in queues for hours to access government services. These measures will directly eliminate intermediaries, reduce corruption, and make government processes traceable. Nepal has demonstrated notable success in digital payments, with private-sector platforms like Khalti, eSewa, and Connect IPS driving the economy toward cashlessness. However, challenges remain, including limited internet access in rural areas (approximately 17%) and only 31% digital literacy.
To address this, government policy needs to focus on making the ‘Digital Nepal for All’ program practical and inclusive. Additionally, the $90 million digital transformation project approved by the World Bank and Asian Development Bank has yet to be implemented. If this project is launched immediately, it will significantly accelerate the development of fundamental infrastructure such as the National Data Exchange Platform, cybersecurity systems, and the digital service portal. This progress could steer Nepal toward a digital governance model similar to Estonia.
Another key aspect of the policy is developing the IT sector as a national strategic industry. By leveraging hydropower and the Himalayan cold climate to establish data centers and AI computing hubs, Nepal has the potential to transform into a ‘Green Digital Economy.’ This initiative could create millions of jobs and attract foreign companies. However, challenges persist: weak cybersecurity evidenced by government website hacks has diminished public trust in digital systems; the outdated Electronic Transactions Act of 2006 remains in effect, a new IT bill has not been passed, and there is no clear implementation of data protection measures, all of which represent significant weaknesses.
Without these reforms, sustainable digital transformation cannot be achieved. Overall, Nepal’s digital journey has reached a critical turning point. The technology, policies, and public support are all in place, but success depends on effective implementation. If the government transparently publishes its progress through a dashboard and meets deadlines, it could establish a new political culture—one where officials are accountable to citizens, and decisions are based on data and technology. The opportunity is now available to create a transparent, accountable, and tech-friendly Nepal as expected by the Gen Z generation. This is not merely a digital project; it is a new definition of good governance where every service is online, every decision traceable, and every leader accountable to the people.
Following the promise, Ravi Lamichhane, chairperson of the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP), received acclaim after Balendra Shah (Balen) was appointed Prime Minister.
However, some questioned whether the internal consensus was truly without controversy.
Chairperson Lamichhane has now put those doubts to rest by publicly declaring that Balen will remain Prime Minister for the full five-year term.
Still, there is growing concern about how sustainable the political alliance between Ravi and Balen will be.
Nepal’s recent decade in politics has also been marked by confrontations between leaders of two influential parties.
Historically, when the party chairperson and the prime minister were different individuals, significant political disagreements or clashes have frequently arisen.
One Man, Two Swords?
Image source, EPA/Shutterstock
It is said that Nepali Congress leader Girija Prasad Koirala pushed Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, who had been a prime ministerial candidate at the polls, out of a majority government.
Leftist parties were no exception to such political tensions.
During the time when Jhalanath Khanal was chairman of the CPN UML and Prachanda led the CPN Maoist, Baburam Bhattarai served as prime minister, but smooth political transitions were difficult.
During KP Sharma Oli’s tenure as prime minister, despite having a majority from the Nepal Communist Party, internal disputes significantly affected the country’s politics.
Some argue that having two conflicting powers vested in the same person, or similar examples, do not bode well for political stability.
Political commentator Dambar Khatiwada says, “They call themselves a new political force, but it is unclear whether they will create a new political culture or maintain the old one. Power struggles, personality conflicts, and factional polarization are likely to increase over a few years.”
Khatiwada also notes similar patterns in the working styles and mentalities of Ravi Lamichhane and Balendra Shah.
Recent Disagreements Unveiled
Image source, Reuters
Controversy has arisen over issues such as cabinet formation, dismissal of ministers, the selection of the deputy speaker, and the Prime Minister Balen’s silence during the brief session of the House of Representatives.
There have also been reports of intense debate between the two leaders regarding the Home Minister’s appointment, and claims that the RSP supported the Labour Culture Party despite the party chairperson’s opposition. However, these reports remain unconfirmed either internally or independently. There was also an incident involving publication of party letters about minister dismissals.
“Even though Balen is prime minister, it seems Ravi Lamichhane is signaling that he is the ‘super prime minister’ in some respects or that only his directives are implemented,” Khatiwada analyzes.
During the first parliamentary session after the new government was formed, although Chairperson Lamichhane spoke, Prime Minister Balen remained silent.
Khatiwada considers this situation unsuitable in terms of parliamentary democracy, and sees potential for these tensions to arise within the party.
He also notes that Balen keeps distance even from his own leaders and parliamentarians, which could prove to be a negative factor.
“Those drawn to power tolerate this boundary to a certain extent, and the freshly elected will endure for a while. But as two years pass, this approach will appear exhausting and humiliating,” Khatiwada warns, “Such dynamics could lead to serious crises or perhaps compel Ravi Lamichhane to sacrifice for the country.”
The ‘Balendra Card’ Still in Play
Image source, EPA/Shutterstock
RSP chairman Lamichhane addressed parliament stating that government priorities, plans, and direction would be demonstrated through actions, possibly with or without verbal input from the respected prime minister.
Some interpret this stance as either a critique of Balen’s subdued speaking style or a defense of it.
DambarKhatiwoda/fb
“They call themselves a new political force, but it remains unclear if they will create a new political culture or maintain the old one. Power struggles are expected to increase soon.”
However, founding general secretary Mukul Dhakal suggests that Balendra’s silence is not due to his inability but a deliberate choice to stay quiet.
Dhakal pointed out that Balendra’s brief speeches have made a sudden impact in Madhesh Province and that his speeches in Koshi, Chitwan, and Sudurpashchim provinces have drawn young audiences.
Nonetheless, questions remain as to why he remains silent in parliament.
Dhakal speculates that Balen might be staying silent out of fear of losing popularity after joining the government.
“Popularity cannot always be maintained while in government, and then speeches aimed at attracting the new generation will likely begin,” says Dhakal, “So, it’s not that he isn’t able to speak; he is saving his card for future popularity.”
‘Balendra’s Impulsiveness and Lamichhane’s Maturity’
Image source, EPA/Shutterstock
Lamichhane is a seasoned political leader familiar with major parties, serving as both MP and minister.
In contrast, Balendra lacks political experience, having become MP and Prime Minister simultaneously.
When the President addressed both houses of the federal parliament, Balendra appeared confused, highlighting his inexperience.
Khatiwada has observed that Prime Minister Balendra is politically less mature but tends to be impulsive during work. However, he is strong economically and ethically.
On the other hand, Lamichhane, linked to legal troubles and financial issues, faces an ethical crisis, which is not ideal for clean politics and transparent democracy, Khatiwada notes.
“Nevertheless, Lamichhane’s grip on the party is strong, and he is also outspoken,” Khatiwada added, “In such cases, he could evolve into an effective politician.”
Founding general secretary Mukul Dhakal believes that Balendra and Lamichhane have contrasting personalities, and recent developments suggest emerging power struggles and distrust between them.
However, both have a strong following across different social groups and strata, which makes it beneficial for the country’s interest that they collaborate.
Nonetheless, intensifying competition among opponents within the reform movement could spark conflict, likely starting from ranks below Balendra and Lamichhane.
How Long Will They Remain United and Why Might They Part Ways?
MukulDhakal/fb
“Both enjoy similar levels of attraction among the public, but competition among the main agents of change is growing, potentially leading to conflict.”
Yet, he points out that because the public supports both leaders, it will not be easy for them to grow distant.
Political forces connecting them have also played a role. “Both must understand that distance will render them both powerless,” Dhakal says.
Some analysts believe Lamichhane was compelled to support Balen due to legal controversies, and after being freed, is pushing for prime ministerial status or more authority.
Dhakal does not predict how long the two leaders will remain together, but expects future rivalry.
“One must become unpopular, or part on grounds of sacrifice or generosity, or one must leave the party; otherwise they will remain competitors struggling with each other, making relationship maintenance difficult,” Dhakal explains.
He describes their relationship as if two badges were pinned onto a single shirt — one above and one below — symbolizing an uneasy coexistence.
We also have a YouTube channel. To watch new content and subscribe, click here. You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter to view our content. Additionally, you can listen to BBC Nepali Service programs on radio at 8:45 PM from Monday to Friday.
Paris Saint-Germain defeated Liverpool 2–0 in the second leg to secure their place in the European Champions League semifinals. PSG achieved a comprehensive 4–0 aggregate victory and will now face the winner between Bayern Munich and Real Madrid.
Osman Dembélé scored the opening goal in the 72nd minute and sealed the team’s victory with a second goal during injury time. The match, held in Kathmandu on April 15, saw no goals in the first half, but Dembélé’s brilliance in the second half ensured PSG’s triumph.
Defending champions Paris Saint-Germain (PSG) defeated Liverpool in the second leg of the quarterfinals held Tuesday night. Despite Liverpool’s attempts to apply pressure on their home ground at Anfield, they were unable to score. A potential comeback was further diminished after a penalty decision against Liverpool was overturned by VAR. With a clear 4–0 aggregate win, PSG has advanced to the semifinals, where they will face the winner of the Bayern Munich vs. Real Madrid matchup.
2 Baisakh, Kathmandu – The Nepali Congress Central Executive Committee is scheduled to hold a meeting today. According to the Congress central office, the meeting is set for 2 PM as per the pre-planned agenda. Prior to this executive meeting, the Congress has also convened a central disciplinary committee meeting, which is called for 11 AM.
The disciplinary committee meeting is being organized following a second statement issued by Purna Bahadur Khadka in his capacity as acting chairman. Although the Election Commission has officially recognized the team led by Gagan Thapa, elected through the special convention, Khadka’s faction continues to engage in parallel activities.
Caption, Tensions between the Vatican and the White House had been escalating for months. The disagreement deepened dramatically after Pope Leo referenced Trump in relation to the Iran war.
Reading time: 5 minutes
Public tensions have surged unusually between U.S. President Donald Trump and Pope Leo XIV concerning the war in Iran.
Appointed in May 2025, the American-born Pope—formerly Cardinal Robert Prevost—initially adopted a quieter tone compared to his predecessor, Pope Francis, who was known as a fierce critic of the Trump administration.
Tensions between the Vatican and the White House had been rising for months. However, the dispute escalated sharply when the Pope directly named Trump.
Foreign Policy
Image source, Reuters
Caption, In his Christmas address, Pope Leo XIV described the people of Gaza as enduring “rain, wind, and cold.”
On Sunday, Trump posted a lengthy message on social media platform Truth Social accusing the Pope of being “weak on crime control and a failure in foreign policy.”
“I cannot accept the Pope’s view that Iran having nuclear weapons is okay,” Trump wrote.
“Nor can I accept the Pope’s criticism of the U.S. for attacking Venezuela, a country that sends massive amounts of drugs to America and empties its jails by releasing murderers and drug traffickers into our nation.”
Trump later posted an image believed to be AI-generated depicting himself as Jesus Christ healing a sick man. This post sparked strong criticism from religious leaders and commentators, and was eventually removed.
Trump’s post was a response to the Pope’s rejection of his threat to “destroy Iranian civilization” over Tehran’s refusal to comply with demands regarding its nuclear program and the Hormuz Strait.
The Pope called the threat “completely unacceptable” and urged Catholics to pressure political leaders to work for peace.
He had previously mentioned Trump by name. On March 31, the Pope told journalists, “I have heard that President Trump recently wants to end the war. I hope he is seeking options to stop it.”
On Sunday, the 70-year-old Pope renewed his call for leaders to end the ongoing bloodshed.
Since taking office last year, Pope Leo emphasized the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of hostages, and guaranteed humanitarian access.
In August 2025, Pope Leo condemned the “collective punishment” and forced displacement faced by Palestinians, describing the situation in Gaza as unacceptable.
Addressing 140 million Catholics worldwide in his Christmas speech, he highlighted the dire conditions in Gaza.
While there has been no public dispute over Gaza, the Pope has privately challenged American and Israeli military operations.
In January this year, the Pope expressed concern regarding the U.S. military’s detention of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
He called for support of Venezuela’s sovereignty, adherence to constitutional rule of law, and respect for human rights.
Immigration
Image source, Getty Images
Caption, The Pope has repeatedly criticized Trump’s strict immigration policies.
Immigration has also emerged as a major point of contention.
Pope Leo has continuously criticized Trump’s tough immigration stance, framing it as a moral responsibility grounded in the Gospel’s compassion and respect for human dignity.
In November 2025, the Pope stated that foreigners in America were facing “harsh and humiliating treatment.” American Catholic bishops also issued a statement expressing concerns over the fear and anxiety created by deportations and immigration enforcement.
The Pope emphasized, “We need to find humane ways to treat people.” However, he also added, “Every country has the right to determine who may enter, how many, and when at its borders.”
In October, during an address at St. Peter’s Square, the Pope urged Catholics to avoid indifference or discrimination against migrants. He also raised questions about whether Trump’s policies aligned with the Church’s ‘pro-life’ values, a critique that sparked debate among traditionalist Catholic circles.
Religion and Political Authority
On Sunday, Trump accused the Pope on social media of stepping outside his legitimate domain, stating, “I do not want a Pope who criticizes the President of the United States. I was elected by a large majority, and I am doing the job accordingly.”
Trump hinted that Leo was appointed Pope mainly because he is American: “If I were not in the White House, Leo wouldn’t be the Pope of the Vatican.”
Heading on an 11-day African tour on Monday, the Pope refused to engage in a personal debate with Trump during the flight.
“I am not a politician and do not wish to debate with Trump,” the Pope said.
“I will continue to speak out against war, and emphasize peace, dialogue, and multilateralism.”
The Trump administration maintains that “the Pope is not afraid of the Trump administration,” noting that he continues to speak in defense of the Gospel.
In the 2024 U.S. election, 55% of Catholic voters supported Republicans. Catholics make up 20% of the American population, and Vice President JD Vance is also Catholic.
The Trump administration has maintained close ties with conservative Evangelical Protestant leaders, portraying the Iran war in religious terms.
Expert Opinions
Image source, Social media
Caption, Trump posted an AI-generated image portraying himself like Jesus Christ healing a man; the post was later deleted.
Experts say the Pope intends to pose a moral challenge to Trump and his foreign policy objectives on the global stage through his recent remarks.
“He speaks cautiously to avoid accusations that the Vatican is lenient on Trump because he is American,” said Italian Vatican affairs expert Massimo Fagioli.
“Leo is a thoughtful speaker. I don’t believe these comments were made casually.”
Chicago Cardinal Blaise Cupich, close to the Pope, noted that like previous popes, the current pontiff sends messages to world leaders to distance themselves from war.
“The difference now is that the messenger speaks in a way that resonates with the American and English-speaking world,” he added.
Marie Dennis, former staff member of the international Catholic peace movement Pax Christi, described the Pope’s recent comments and direct appeal to Trump as “a reflection of the hearts of people weary of ongoing violence.”
“It is an effort to bring together all those tired of relentless violence who expect courageous leadership,” Dennis stated.
Our YouTube channel is also available. To subscribe and watch videos, click here. You can also find our content on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Our radio program airs regularly from Monday to Friday at 8:45 PM.
In the UEFA Champions League quarterfinal second leg, Barcelona defeated Atletico Madrid 2-1. However, having fallen behind 3-2 on aggregate, Barcelona was eliminated from the competition. Atletico Madrid advanced to the semifinals.
April 15, Kathmandu – Despite winning the second leg of the UEFA Champions League quarterfinal on Tuesday night, Barcelona was eliminated due to trailing on aggregate score. From the start, Barcelona showed outstanding performance but was unable to achieve the necessary result.
Barcelona took the lead in the fourth minute in Madrid with a goal from Lamin Yamal. Ferran Torres equalized on aggregate with a goal in the 24th minute. However, in the 31st minute, Ademola Lookman scored to restore Atletico’s lead. In the second half, Barcelona continued to press but failed to score. At the 79th minute, Eric Garcia received a red card, reducing Barcelona to 10 players. Unable to find an equalizer before the final whistle, Barcelona’s comeback bid fell short. With this win, Atletico Madrid secured a spot in the semifinals, where they will face the winner of the Arsenal vs. Sporting CP tie.
April 15, Kathmandu – The second national economic census officially commences across the country today. According to the Central Bureau of Statistics, enumerators and necessary supervisors have already been deployed to respective areas for this census. As per the schedule, the field data collection is expected to be completed within the first week of Ashar (mid-June to mid-July). Approximately 5,000 personnel have been mobilized for this operation.
The Ministry of Finance has appealed for full cooperation as comprehensive data will be gathered from the industrial and economic sectors nationwide. The census will cover 18 fundamental economic sectors including industry, commerce, service sectors, cooperatives, private sector, and public institutions, capturing detailed information such as the number and type of establishments, investment, employment, production, and service delivery.
During this process, all registered and unregistered major and minor business establishments, employers or self-employed enterprises, other industries, factories, trade businesses, non-governmental organizations, government bodies, as well as government and private schools and hospitals will be counted. Preparatory phases for the economic census were completed by the end of Falgun (mid-February to mid-March). At the beginning of Chaitra (mid-March to mid-April), 77 district and an additional 7, totaling 84 offices, were established. These offices will remain operational until the end of Ashar (mid-June to mid-July).
The previous national economic census was conducted in 2018 (2075 BS), at which time data revealed 923,356 establishments and businesses operating nationwide.
The new year 2083 in the Nepali calendar presents not just a change in dates but a golden opportunity to improve thinking, policies, behavior, and management across the sports sector in Nepal.
Nepal is preparing to participate in the 20th Asian Games scheduled to be held in Aichi Nagoya, Japan in 2083. However, the Football Association of Nepal (Rastriya Khelkud Parishad – RAKHEP) is currently suspended and faces a looming threat of FIFA suspension. The Sports Ministry is currently overseen by the Minister of Education, Science, and Technology, Sasmit Pokharel, with talks underway to integrate this ministry into the education sector.
With the beginning of 2083, a renewed enthusiasm, energy, and hope has emerged among all Nepalis. As every year, there are fresh expectations to elevate Nepalese sports to new heights. Although Nepal will not participate in major events like the World Cup this year, the 20th Asian Games, often considered the Olympics of Asia and to be held in Aichi Nagoya, Japan, will be the largest sporting event Nepal will engage in this year.
However, due to provisions requiring qualifying matches and ranking inclusion to participate in the Asian Games, Nepal will send fewer athletes compared to previous years. The government will need to allocate budget accordingly.
So far, over 400 athletes from 32 different sports have registered for the 20th Asian Games, but the final list of competitors remains uncertain. The National Sports Council launched Mission 26 with the goal of winning gold medals and double-digit medal counts, yet this program has not been consistently implemented. Further detailed discussions on this matter are necessary.
Additionally, discussions are needed regarding Nepal’s participation in other major international competitions. Alongside the Asian Games, Nepali athletes will compete in various individual sports tournaments ranging from World Championships to Asian Championships. Regional international competitions in popular sports such as cricket, football, and volleyball will also be hosted in Nepal, with assured Nepali participation. Cricket will feature league and bilateral series, and volleyball will participate in and organize the Kavre Regional competitions.
Currently, with the Football Association of Nepal suspended and under threat of FIFA ban, Nepal’s participation in the SAFF Championship for both men and women is at risk. This puts Nepal’s football community in crisis and demands collaboration among all stakeholders to preserve the sport.
Despite the formation of a new government led by young Prime Minister Balendra Shah after the Genji Movement and general elections in 2082, a separate ministry for sports has not been established. Sports responsibilities currently fall under Minister Sasmit Pokharel, who is also the government spokesperson, resulting in limited prioritization for sports. There is even discussion of merging the sports ministry into the education sector.
Following the expiration of Secretary Tank Lal Ghising’s term at RAKHEP last year, the appointment process for a new member secretary has stalled. At present, Ram Charitra Mehta from the Sports Ministry is handling RAKHEP’s responsibilities, though the duration of his assignment remains uncertain. This leaves a leadership vacuum in Nepalese sports administration.
While some disputes within the Nepal Olympic Committee have been partially resolved, strong coordination between the government and the committee is essential to ensure steady participation in multi-sport events like the Olympics and the Asian Games.
The National Games, aimed at identifying talented athletes and nurturing future stars, have not been held for two years. Although preparation for the 11th National Games should be underway following the 10th games held a year ago, the schedule remains undecided. Organizing the 10th National Games again this year appears necessary.
As the new year begins, there is a pressing need for reforms in Nepalese sports with fresh aspirations and commitments. With proper planning, capable leadership, efficient management, and sound budgeting and investment, this year could be highly significant for Nepali sports. The talent pool is ample, but improvements are required in mindset, policy, infrastructure, and long-term strategies.
Political interference and politicization pose additional challenges. Only through awareness and conscientious efforts can Nepalese sports achieve major success. The overall structure, management, infrastructure, and long-term planning deficits have impeded rapid progress and must be addressed.
True development and international advancement in sports require a strong, autonomous management structure free from political influence. The country needs to build and upgrade high-quality sports infrastructure nationwide, including quality fields, training centers, and modern equipment, which are currently lacking in many disciplines. Enhancements in training, technology application, data analytics, sports science, and mental preparation are also essential.
Ensuring athletes’ respect and safety is indispensable. Many athletes have devoted their entire lives to sports but face financial insecurity, lack health insurance, and uncertainty about their futures. Attracting youth to sports is critical, especially in the digital age where many young people increasingly rely on technology.
Opportunities to professionalize sports in Nepal are expanding. It is necessary to broaden professional leagues across cricket, football, volleyball, kabaddi, and other sports. Enhancing international relations and participation will also aid sports development. Although Nepali women athletes have made notable progress, they still lack sufficient opportunities, facilities, and support.
Private sector investment is crucial for sustainable sports development. Corporate policies to promote investment in sports are imperative. Sports are not merely about winning or losing but represent national identity, pride, and unity. When Nepali athletes perform excellently on the international stage, the honor extends beyond the individual to the entire nation. Hence, sports must be given national priority.
The new year 2083 offers an opportunity for renewed commitment by all stakeholders—government, sports organizations, athletes, coaches, private sector, and the people of Nepal—to elevate Nepalese sports. May the coming year bring new achievements, create history, and enhance Nepal’s prominence internationally. Heartfelt best wishes for the new year 2083!
The government has released a draft commitment to establish 17 ministries under the federal government. The draft includes a proposal to transform the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers’ Office into a direct monitoring center for climate change and major projects. It also expresses a commitment to form a high-level Administrative Structure Review Commission to eliminate operational redundancies and restructure public administration. April 14, Kathmandu.
The government made the draft commitment public for debate. This draft report is based on the commitment letters, manifestos, and pledges of the six national parties formed during the House of Representatives election. Presented as a national commitment, the draft specifies the formation of 17 ministries within the federal government.
While the Rastriya Swatantra Party’s manifesto proposed 18 ministries, and the Congress party’s pre-election pledge targeted 16 ministries, the draft for administrative reform proposes transforming the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers’ Office into a coordination hub among ministries as well as a direct monitoring center for climate change and major projects.
The draft also includes a proposal to convert the National Planning Commission into a think tank focused on statistics and monitoring. Additionally, it suggests restructuring the Policy Research Institute. The commitment emphasizes establishing a merit-based system to ensure effective interrelations among federal, provincial, and local levels. To remove functional duplications and promote a competitive public administration, the draft manifesto outlines forming a high-level Administrative Structure Review Commission.
The Congressional Research Service of the US Congress has released a report on Nepal’s new political leadership and power dynamics. The report characterizes the alliance between Balen and RASWPA as a ‘marriage of convenience,’ meaning an alliance driven by circumstance rather than deep ideological unity. It also covers the violent protests of September 2025, Oli’s resignation, and RASWPA’s electoral success. Kathmandu, April 14.
The US Congressional Research Service published a document titled ‘Nepal’s Parliamentary Election’ on March 31, 2026, examining the emergence of new political leadership and shifting power equations in Nepal, moving away from established old forces. The report describes the alliance between former independent Kathmandu mayor Balendra Shah (Balen) and the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RASWPA) as less about ideological cohesion and more of a ‘marriage of convenience’—a strategic alliance formed due to prevailing circumstances.
The report provides an in-depth analysis of Nepal’s recent internal political turmoil, the Genji uprising, geopolitical challenges, and the new power configuration born from these events. It portrays RASWPA as a relatively new and centrist political party. The document notes that frequent changes in alliances among political leaders have undermined political stability in the country.
Quoting analysts, the report describes Balen Shah’s electoral coalition with RASWPA, despite his independent mayoral background, as a strategic and self-interested alliance—a ‘marriage of convenience.’ It underscores Balen’s mixed track record as mayor and a lack of clarity in administrative planning. Regarding potential challenges facing the new government, the report warns, ‘The new RASWPA-led government will likely have to confront potential tensions between Balen Shah and RASWPA leadership as a primary challenge moving forward.’
After the Sugauli Treaty, Nepal lost its geopolitical strength and economic potential, becoming vulnerable under the pressure of global powers.
Following the Treaty of Kanagawa, Japan acknowledged its weaknesses, modernized rapidly, and emerged as a regional superpower.
Post-Sugauli, Nepal was mired in internal conflicts and power struggles, failing to enhance national capacity.
Throughout world history, a persistent truth resurfaces: as global powers rise, geopolitical storms affect all nations, yet not all advance equally. Some turn pressures into opportunities and rewrite their destiny, while others vanish or are pushed to the margins by the waves of change.
Nepal’s current marginal position amid geopolitical turmoil is a harsh reality we all must recognize. Following treaties with dominant global powers, today’s generations move around the world in a state of implicit economic subjugation. It is crucial to understand that after such historic turning points, Japan transformed its defeat into a “wake-up call” and achieved a tremendous leap toward modernization.
In this context, the historical parallels between Japan’s modernization process and Nepal’s treaty experiences are striking. I had the opportunity to interact with a renowned Japanese scientist who has developed new earthquake-resistant alloys.
The scientist, attending a conference in Nepal, expressed interest in Nepal’s current economic and political situation.
Japan’s journey to becoming a great power centers on the mantra, “We were weak; we must change immediately.” This awareness propelled Japan toward continuous transformation.
He linked Japan’s state after the Meiji Restoration to the Treaty of Kanagawa and said, “Youth must understand history; it is useful even in science.” He shared insights into Japan’s development in modern economics and scientific education.
This brief exchange revealed that Japanese scientists are not confined to laboratories but are also thinkers deeply engaged in history, geopolitics, and nation-building. This comprehensive understanding is the true foundation of Japan’s modernization.
By contrast, Nepal signed the Treaty of Kanagawa’s counterpart, the Sugauli Treaty, about 38 years earlier, yet results diverged significantly. Where Japan converted defeat into opportunity, Nepal lost both geopolitical power and economic prospects.
The Rana regime brought stability but missed the chance for economic transformation. This article compares Japan’s development trajectory to Nepal’s post-Sugauli errors.
What was Nepal’s state before the Sugauli Treaty? King Prithvi Narayan Shah unified small states, laying the foundation of modern Nepal by securing strategic economic and trade centers and creating centralized power.
His achievements in a limited time helped safeguard the nation.
Meanwhile, Europe was engulfed in wars and scientific revolutions, and Britain was rising as a world power through the Industrial Revolution. Japan, under the Edo era, remained isolated from foreign influence. China was an economic superpower, and Korea was under Chinese influence.
Amidst this global environment, the Sugauli Treaty was signed. Britain was expanding its Indian empire, and Nepal fought a major war that shifted the balance of power at the time.
After defeat, Nepal lost about one-third of its territory and was forced into disadvantageous treaties. Lack of foresight in the political leadership caused profound grief for Nepal.
In contrast, Japan signed the Treaty of Kanagawa with the United States and chose the path of modernization that led it to become a powerful nation. Nepal missed this opportunity.
Internal strife and power struggles after the treaty prevented Nepal from building national capacity. Even with leadership changes, no awakening comparable to China’s “wake-up” was evident in Nepal.
Looking at Northeast Asia, it is clear how Nepal weakened under economic and geopolitical pressures.
The question of how Japan became a powerhouse after being forced by the U.S. into trade agreements is highly relevant to Nepal. While Nepal missed diplomatic opportunities, Japan used them constructively.
After the Sugauli Treaty, Nepal became a pawn in the hands of world powers and was entangled in internal conflicts. It failed to build networks for nation-building or collaborate effectively with Britain. Japan, however, progressed by constructing a system for prosperity.
Following the opening to the West, Japan abandoned isolation and achieved significant advances in military, education, and industrial sectors. Under Emperor Meiji, Japan adopted British-style governance and entered a new era.
In a meeting with Professor Sadaori Sadoshima of Waseda University, Japan’s imperial expansion and attendant regional growth were discussed. The message conveyed was clear: Nepal should learn from its errors post-Sugauli Treaty.
Japan extended influence over Korea, Taiwan, and China, becoming a superpower in the Asia-Pacific region—an important history Nepal must consider.
Despite devastating losses, post-World War II Japan emerged as the world’s second-largest economy, competing with the United States—an extraordinary model of development.
While China and Korea lost ground, Nepal’s situation appears bleak. Failure to prioritize modernization in time has left Nepal vulnerable.
Under General Chung Hee Park, South Korea swiftly industrialized and developed technical education, achieving economic heights. Nepal’s King Mahendra restored stability but limited economic reforms contributed significantly to Nepal’s lagging status.
The Sugauli Treaty and the Lipulekh Dispute
Failure to establish modern economic capacity made Nepal an easy pawn for international power plays. Regional powers have repeatedly signed treaties influencing smaller states, with Nepal frequently on the weaker side and forced into silence.
After the Sugauli Treaty, Nepal became constrained, forced to concede water agreements and remain powerless at strategic border posts. Strategic locations like Lipulekh still face foreign pressures today.
Nepal must focus on qualitative improvements in education, military, and industry to build a foundation for a modern nation. Delay in decisive action will make history harsher.
Trade operations at Lipulekh without Nepal’s participation question Nepal’s sovereignty. The problems that started with the Sugauli Treaty persist, threatening Nepal’s very existence.
History shows countries like Japan, Korea, and China leveraged geopolitical challenges as opportunities—demonstrating the critical role of nation-building decisions.
What Should Nepal Do Now?
First, we must understand history. While global powers act in their own interest, countries remaining passive have their futures written by others. Denying weaknesses is dangerous.
Nepal failed to develop this awareness after the Sugauli Treaty, and it remains absent even after the Lipulekh incursions. Consequently, Nepal has long been subject to geopolitical pressure.
We have seen the annexation of Sikkim and witnessed geopolitical crises in nations like Ukraine and Iran. Diplomatic maneuvers alone will not safeguard Nepal’s territory. Often called a “bamboo between two stones,” Nepal consistently faces external pressures.
Now, Nepal must aim to become not a “motionless bridge” but a “dynamic hub” actively creating opportunities and advancing.
Substantive reforms in education, defense, and industry are essential to lay the foundation for a modern state. Delay will only deepen the challenges in history yet to come. The current leadership must take decisive steps, reflecting the consent of the people.
Nepali Congress conducted election review programs in Madhesh, Gandaki, and Lumbini provinces after suffering defeat in the House of Representatives elections.
The review revealed internal betrayal, lack of cooperation, and misunderstandings among supporters of the special general convention as major reasons for the loss.
Party President Gagan Thapa emphasized the need for unity within the party and urged respect for all leaders moving forward.
April 14, Kathmandu – Following its electoral defeat, Nepali Congress is conducting detailed election reviews across the provinces, starting a month after the elections concluded. The process began in Madhesh Province under the leadership of party President Gagan Thapa.
The party has completed reviews in Madhesh, Gandaki, and Lumbini provinces on March 24, 27, and 29 respectively.
Further review programs were scheduled for April 16 in Surkhet (Karnali Province), April 18 in Dhangadhi (Sudurpashchim Province), April 20 in Hetauda (Bagmati Province), and April 22 in Biratnagar (Koshi Province).
However, after the central office postponed the Surkhet review to April 24, the events in other provinces were also delayed accordingly.
Nepali Congress Karnali Province Secretary Niranjan KC released a statement informing that the provincial level review initially set for April 16 will now occur on April 24.
President Thapa, having lost to Rastriya Swatantra Party leader Dr. Amresh Kumar Singh in Sarlahi-4, visited Madhesh Province on March 24 to hold the first election review.
The review in Janakpur, Dhanusha, included participation from top leaders such as President Thapa, Vice President Pushpa Bhusal, General Secretary Gururaj Ghimire, Joint General Secretaries Farmulla Mansur and Dr. Dila Sangraula.
Congress evaluated candidates from 32 constituencies, regional and district chairs, province chairs, office bearers, and central representatives of Madhesh Province.
Attendees reported discussions focused on reasons for the defeat and future strategies.
Complaints regarding internal betrayal within the party surfaced, with accusations that some leaders withheld votes or failed to collaborate. Ramdev Shah, Congress Chair of Saptari, stated, “We discussed why the election was lost and the reasons behind it. Concerns arose about Congress obtaining fewer votes than active membership numbers.”
Shah added, “Those involved in betrayal must face disciplinary action. I clearly stated that action is necessary against those who failed to cooperate.”
Regional Secretary Rajesh Bhandari from Bara-3 also stressed the urgent need to end indiscipline, saying, “Those who obstruct must be punished. This should be seriously analyzed and disciplinary action intensified.”
Madhesh leaders cited multiple reasons for Congress’s loss, acknowledging that no single factor was responsible. They noted failure to grasp the wave of change and the defeat of honest leaders as significant issues, cautioning against hasty conclusions.
Outgoing party leaders aligned with former President Sher Bahadur Deuba, including Ramesh Rizal, Ajay Chaurasiya, and Dinesh Yadawal, participated in the review and urged President Thapa to unify and advance the party.
Leader Bhandari remarked, “We assured the president of our support and that we would unite the party. There is no alternative to Gagan Thapa; he must move forward.”
The review also addressed reforming the party’s membership system away from outdated methods. Saptari Chair Shah said, “Membership must be renewed, and organization strengthened accordingly.”
The special general convention issue was raised as well. Regional Secretary Bhandari commented, “Though the policy from the special general convention was good, the timing was poor. The Congress lost partly because it communicated with the public late.”
After Madhesh, the party conducted the Gandaki Province review on March 27 in Pokhara. Throughout this review, President Thapa appeared neither cheerful nor enthusiastic.
District chairs, candidates, and central officials delivered speeches during the session, which Thapa listened to attentively.
His demeanor differed significantly from that during the provincial assembly on January 6, prior to the elections on February 4.
It was only natural that President Thapa was not upbeat following a poor election outcome. As various leaders analyzed the results, he asked few questions.
Some leaders pointed out that the special general convention prevented party unity and sent negative signals before the election. Many described public opinion as a ‘storm’ that weakened Congress’s position.
Some attendees issued warning words against President Thapa, saying, “Previously, I battled with the ‘daís’ (elder brothers); now, do not fight with the special convention leadership too.”
Syangja Chair Raju Thapa urged President Thapa to collaborate with outgoing President Deuba and other leaders to move forward. He noted, “Earlier, the government and circumstances were not favorable to Congress; there was no protest.”
District Chair Raju Thapa emphasized that unity was the only option for Congress and urged focus on this effort. “It is time for you to take charge. Do not rise up against others next time,” he added.
The district chair clarified that vote loss was not due to the special general convention. “National and international conditions were not in Congress’s favor,” he said.
Joint General Secretary Dr. Dila Sangraula said the review discussed causes of defeat, future direction, and concerns. “Many said Congress received fewer votes than active membership numbers,” she revealed.
Dr. Sangraula informed that leaders urged the leadership to unify the party during the Gandaki review. “They said they support the leadership and emphasized the need to unite the party,” she added.
Following Gandaki, the party held the Lumbini Province election review on March 29 in Bhaluwang, Dang. Leaders cited internal betrayal, lack of cooperation from regular convention supporters, and attraction towards new parties as key causes of defeat.
Election review program held at Bhaluwang, Dang, on Lumbini Province level.
Some leaders remarked that the special general convention failed to reconcile with regular convention supporters and that an anti-party election wave cost them the election.
Regional Chair Poshan KC from Banke-1 said, “There was a wave in favor of the Rastriya Swatantra Party. The regular faction should have been united, which was a weakness as it was not achieved.”
Kamal Muslim, a candidate from Kapilvastu-1, criticized the decision to contest elections without publicly releasing the Gauribahadur Karki Commission report, calling it a major party mistake. “The report should have been disclosed to identify the culprits. It did not happen. Then Prime Minister Sushila Karki misled the leaders,” he claimed.
Kiran Kishore Ghimire, candidate in Dang-2, alleged that regular faction leaders did not assist, and that leaders including Sher Bahadur Deuba did not campaign or vote.
Banke Chair Arun Singh Rathore objected to Ghimire’s comments, stating, “It is not appropriate to criticize Sher Bahadur. He should contest the election with his ticket. We will not lose.”
Rathore added, “The special convention supporters told the outgoing president to remain silent, but this did not imply staying away from campaigning.”
MP Sandeep Rana from Palpa-1 urged all party members to overcome self-interest and engage in introspection. “Congress must move forward united, not divided. It is better to be a capable party worker than a leader of a weak party,” he said.
Lumbini Province Chair Amar Singh Pun stressed the full implementation of federalism within the party. He called for restructuring the central organization using federal terminology and principles.
During the review, some candidates complained about delayed ticket distribution resulting in reduced campaign time. Asutosh Mishra from Rupandehi-2 demanded action against those who obstructed.
Formal speeches were not permitted for regional chairs during the review. However, Banke-1 Chair KC shared informal observations, emphasizing party unity first. “Party unity must precede election review. We must start a root-level campaign, ensuring fairness across all factions,” he said.
KC remarked, “Identifying who lost in the election is irrelevant when a tsunami swept the country. The winner secured 60,000 votes, Congress got only 8,000. The party can only move forward united.”
He noted that President Thapa emphasized placing the party at the center of all efforts.
KC concluded, “Let us keep the party as the focal point. We are not individuals. Regular convention supporters are senior leaders and deserve respect. We are ready to step back if necessary to prioritize the party and move forward.”
