Skip to main content

Author: space4knews

Deputy Chairman Bishwprakash Sharma Travels to Gundu, Bhaktapur for Discussions on Change of Karnali Chief Minister

Bishwprakash Sharma, the Deputy Chairman of the Nepali Congress, has arrived in Gundu, Bhaktapur to meet with UML Chairman KP Sharma Oli to discuss the change of the Chief Minister of Karnali Province. Sharma, accompanied by Deputy General Secretary Uday Shamser Rana, visited Oli on Tuesday evening for talks. (29 Baisakh, Kathmandu)

The meeting between Bishwprakash Sharma and KP Sharma Oli in Gundu, Bhaktapur is aimed at discussing the change in the Chief Minister of Karnali Province. The leaders have indicated that the talks will also focus on other provincial issues and leadership changes.

सर्वोच्चमा दुई समूहबीच बढ्न थाल्यो टकराव – Online Khabar

Rising Conflict Between Two Groups in the Supreme Court

April 11, Kathmandu — Four days after the Constitutional Council broke tradition by recommending Dr. Manoj Sharma, the fourth senior-most judge, as the Chief Justice, the constitutional bench convened on Monday. The bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Sapana Pradhan Malla, included the next two senior judges, Kumar Regmi and Hari Phuyal. Since his recommendation as Chief Justice, Dr. Manoj Sharma has not participated in the bench proceedings and was absent at this session. During the hearing, judges Nahakul Subedi and Til Prasad Shrestha were on leave, while Binod Sharma and Sharanga Subedi were present on the constitutional bench.

The constitutional bench encountered disagreements among judges over two pending petitions. In the first petition, an interim order was issued restraining the removal of trade unions from the civil service. Acting Chief Justice Sapana Pradhan, along with judges Kumar Regmi and Hari Phuyal, issued an order suspending the enforcement of the ordinance that sought to abolish trade unions in the civil service for the time being. However, judges Sharanga Subedi and Binod Sharma dissented, arguing that the interim order was unnecessary.

Similarly, differences surfaced in the second matter concerning legislation passed by the Sudurpashchim Provincial Assembly, which is alleged to conflict with federal law. Three judges issued a short-term interim order, but judges Binod Sharma and Sharanga Subedi expressed divergent views regarding whether the dispute should have been brought before the constitutional bench and criticized the issuance of the interim order without adequate discussion.

According to a Supreme Court judge, recent events have weakened mutual understanding among judges, increasing the likelihood of factionalism. The judge stated, “Since the constitutional bench recommended Dr. Manoj Sharma’s name last Wednesday, judges in the Supreme Court have divided into two groups, and the effects of this division are beginning to manifest in various ways. We were vigilant to ensure that these developments would not impact the judiciary, but given the current trends, it appears difficult to prevent.”

Dharan Sub-Metropolitan Requests Central Government’s Assistance Over Cooperative Fund Misappropriation

Dharan Sub-Metropolitan Municipality has sought assistance from the central government regarding the misappropriation of nearly NPR 12 billion by Barah and Shreya Savings and Credit Cooperatives operating in Dharan. The municipality reported that Barah Cooperative misappropriated approximately NPR 11 billion, while Shreya Cooperative misused over NPR 1 billion. Both cooperatives have subsequently shut down, and their management is currently absconding. Due to limited resources, the municipality has been unable to resolve the issue and has classified these cooperatives as problematic, requesting federal government support for justice and appropriate legal action.

Following the misappropriation by these two major cooperatives in Sunsari’s Dharan, totaling around NPR 12.5 billion, the Dharan Sub-Metropolitan Municipality has formally appealed for the federal government’s intervention to address the issue. Barah Savings and Credit Cooperative and Shreya Savings and Credit Cooperative have caused substantial losses to the public, and the situation has escalated beyond local control, prompting the municipality to send a letter to the federal authorities.

Of these two cooperatives operating in Dharan, Barah is accused of misappropriating approximately NPR 11 billion, while Shreya is reported to have misused more than NPR 1 billion. Both cooperatives are currently non-operational, with their executives having fled. Barah Cooperative, under the jurisdiction of the Dharan Sub-Metropolitan, has been experiencing difficulties since 2022 (2079 BS). The municipality officially declared it problematic on September 7, 2025 (2082 Bhadra 22).

A case has been filed in the district court against 262 persons associated with Barah Cooperative for the alleged misappropriation of NPR 10.73 billion (NPR 1,073,434,7913), which is presently under judicial review. Since 2020 (2077 BS), Shreya Cooperative has faced challenges, with over NPR 1 billion found to be misappropriated. The chairman of Shreya, Lok Bahadur Limbu, fled overseas after the issues arose. A case is pending against him at the Sunsari District Court, currently adjourned.

Dismissive Attitudes Emerge at Public Accounts Committee’s First Meeting

The Public Accounts Committee of the House of Representatives convened its first meeting on Wednesday, attended by 24 members of parliament. The session lasted approximately an hour and fifteen minutes; however, only 11 MPs remained present at the conclusion. MPs emphasized the necessity of maintaining attendance and fully engaging in discussions to ensure effective meetings. Kathmandu, 12 May. In recent years, the word “hata” has frequently been heard in the federal parliament. This term refers to the tendency of MPs to mark attendance but then leave or shy away from active participation.

Following the formation of parliamentary committees, the Public Accounts Committee held its inaugural meeting on Wednesday under the House of Representatives. After the general elections on 4 March, the parliamentary subject committees were established by 10 April. On 17 April, all committees appointed their chairpersons. After Bharat Bahadur Khadka from the Nepali Congress was chosen as chairperson, the Public Accounts Committee assembled for the first time on Tuesday. At this meeting, some MPs appeared briefly but left shortly afterward. While some expressed their views, others showed little patience in listening to their colleagues’ opinions.

The meeting was scheduled for 10 a.m. but commenced approximately 25 minutes late. Committee Chair Khadka informed members that a presentation regarding committee matters was planned. He outlined that the agenda included initial discussions on the subjects and procedural directions the committee would undertake moving forward. Subsequently, Secretary Ekram Giri delivered a presentation on the significance and jurisdiction of the Public Accounts Committee.

The secretary elaborated on the committee’s mandate, including oversight of public accounts, the annual audit report by the Auditor General, and monitoring related entities. During the presentation, attendance was still ongoing. After it concluded, MPs began departing one after another. Some shared their views before leaving, while others exited without comment. Reasons such as discussions in the Ministry of Physical Infrastructure or meetings at party’s parliamentary offices were cited when MPs requested leave from Chair Khadka.

The session lasted roughly one hour and fifteen minutes. Although 24 MPs were present according to attendance records, Nepali Congress MP Mohan Acharya was absent due to being outside Kathmandu. By the time Chair Khadka concluded his address at the meeting’s end, only 11 MPs remained. These included Rashtriya Swatantra Party MPs Bipin Kumar Acharya, Ramesh Kumar Sapkota; Nepali Congress’s Yogesh Gauchan Thakali; Nepali Communist Party’s Mahendra Bahadur Shahi; CPN-UML’s Ganesh Singh Thagunna; Rastriya Prajatantra Party’s Khusbu Oli; and Aryan Rai from the Labour and Culture Party, among others.

The remaining MPs had exited the meeting. One MP expressed concern, saying, “If this is the situation at the first meeting, what will the state of affairs be in the future?” Several MPs stressed the importance of making the Public Accounts Committee more effective. They underscored the need to ensure attendance at the start of meetings and to regulate those leaving before critical discussions or decision-making processes concluded.

Rastriya Swatantra Party MP Bipin Acharya proposed implementing a calendar for parliamentary committee work, highlighting its essentiality. “Let’s take our time and proceed with thorough discussions when needed,” he suggested. He also recommended maintaining records of completed work over specified months. Labour and Culture Party MP Nishkal Rai emphasized focusing on serious financial issues, pointing out that 700 billion rupees have remained unpaid from earlier periods and that new arrears must also be managed. He stressed the gravity of the committee’s responsibilities.

MP Rai further noted that MPs must invest sufficient time to make committee meetings effective. Nepali Communist Party MP Mahendra Bahadur Shahi urged that the Public Accounts Committee should be “work-oriented” and proceed accordingly. He highlighted the need to avoid criticism about the committee’s effectiveness by ensuring all efforts were duly productive.

क्यानका तत्कालीन महानिर्देशकसहित ३ जनाविरुद्ध मुद्दा दर्ता – Online Khabar

Case Registered Against Former CAAN Director General and Two Others

A case has been filed against three individuals, including the chief of the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority (CIAA), Prem Kumar Rai, and other senior officials, for allegedly threatening to kill them. The police have registered the case against suspended Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (CAAN) Director General Pradeep Adhikari, along with Prakash Pathak and Taraprasad Kharel.

The police located Pathak hiding in the Philippines and repatriated him to Nepal with the assistance of Interpol. On April 12 (29th Baisakh), Kathmandu, three individuals were charged with threatening to kill CIAA chief Prem Kumar Rai and other senior officials.

The police filed the case against three people, including suspended CAAN Director General Pradeep Adhikari. Prakash Pathak, residing in Temal-1, Kavre, and Taraprasad Kharel from Buddhashanti Rural Municipality-2, Jhapa, are the other accused. The police stated that they allegedly pressured CIAA chief Rai to resign by using the name of a terrorist organization called ‘EGN’ in a coordinated manner.

The investigation is ongoing with charges including illicit gains from crime, criminal conspiracy, violations of the Electronic Transactions Act, and offenses under the Organized Crime Act, among others.

Prime Minister’s Neglect Undermines Traditional Policy Program

Prime Minister Balendra Shah left the joint parliamentary session abruptly after presenting the policy and program document, an act deemed disrespectful by many towards both the document and the institution. The government has introduced a 100-point policy program, which includes preparing a discussion paper on constitutional amendments and initiating a new phase of economic reforms. The program incorporates initiatives to develop the digital economy, enforce zero tolerance against corruption, and promote investment; however, it lacks a clear plan for human resource development. Kathmandu, 29 Baisakh.

Following the rebellion in Bhadra and the elections in Falgun, many had expected the first policy document from Balendra’s government to break historic patterns. Drawn directly from the election manifesto’s 100 points, the government’s policy document also consists of 100 points, but there are no significant agendas for substantive reform. The prime minister’s behavior during the policy presentation was notably different from previous leaders. His abrupt departure from the parliamentary session mid-presentation has been criticized by experts and analysts as an insult not only to parliament and the president but also to one of the government’s most important policy documents.

Most points in the government’s policy document are repetitions of older issues, lacking major transformational content, said Dr. Ramesh Paudel, an associate professor at Tribhuvan University and former member of the National Planning Commission. While contexts differ, the first two items in the new policy document closely relate to announcements made by the previous administration last year. The former government had also declared intentions to amend the constitution and undertake comprehensive economic reforms. In the joint sitting of the Federal Parliament on Monday, President Ramchandra Paudel announced the policy program with the first point committing to prepare a ‘constitutional amendment discussion paper.’ To facilitate this, the government has established a task force working within the current fiscal year to develop the discussion paper on constitutional amendments.

NEFIN Objects to Removal of Tribal Institution Officials

News Summary

Editorially reviewed.

  • The Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities (NEFIN) has demanded the reinstatement of officials and council members of the National Foundation for the Upliftment of Indigenous Nationalities who were removed through an ordinance.
  • NEFIN maintains that the dismissed council members were appointed based on decisions of their respective ethnic organizations, not political appointments, and therefore should not have been removed.
  • NEFIN officials have submitted an 18-point memorandum to the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist) and the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre), urging inclusion of indigenous nationalities’ demands in constitutional amendments.

April 11, Kathmandu – The Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities (NEFIN) has expressed its disagreement after officials and council members of the National Foundation for the Upliftment of Indigenous Nationalities were removed through an ordinance.

NEFIN has demanded the reinstatement of the dismissed council members, emphasizing that these members were appointed not through political channels but based on collective decisions by their respective ethnic organizations, and thus should not have been removed.

Additionally, NEFIN has called for the reappointment of the dismissed officials to ensure the foundation functions fully, and today submitted an 18-point memorandum to both the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist) and the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre). This memorandum also includes other demands of indigenous nationalities.

NEFIN Chairperson Nimi Lama Hyolmo, Vice Chairperson Amrit Sunuwar, and General Secretary Bimal Saru, among others, have urged authorities to pay special attention to including the demands of indigenous nationalities during constitutional amendments while submitting the memorandum.

UML Revises Its Statements; Thapa Reiterates Them in Parliament

News Summary

  • UML parliamentary leader Ram Bahadur Thapa has raised questions again on the government’s policy and program, urging for its rewriting.
  • Thapa criticized the government’s silence on the role of the Nepalese Army and the encroachment of Lipulekh.
  • Following Thapa’s remarks, Rastriya Swatantra Party (Raswapa) and Rastriya Prajatantra Party (RPP) MPs demanded the removal of his statements from parliamentary records.

April 11, Kathmandu – At the current parliamentary session, UML parliamentary party leader Ram Bahadur Thapa has once again made controversial remarks regarding the Nepalese Army, similar to those he voiced during the previous session.

While participating in the discussion on the government’s policy and program on Tuesday, Thapa also expressed critical views about the army.

“When the country was devastated and the headquarters of our Commander-in-Chief was attacked, why did the Nepalese Army, the nation’s chief protector, remain mysteriously silent?” Thapa questioned in the House of Representatives on Tuesday. “While encroachment took place at Lipulekh, why was the unaware army conducting parades in settlers’ villages?”

He remarked that the government’s policy and program is worthy of rejection and recommended that it be rewritten. “The hundred-point policy and program is merely a new version and continuation of the so-called hundred-point manifesto. Therefore, to protect the nation from an extraordinary crisis, it needs to be discarded and rewritten,” he said.

Thapa alleged that the Rastriya Swatantra Party (Raswapa) is part of a planned process aiming for unilateral rule and raised several questions that were not addressed in the policy program. Following opposition from other MPs within the parliament who did not support his statements, UML seemed to be on the defensive as well.

Thapa raised questions about the rise of Raswapa, scenes from the People’s War movement, and the role of the Nepalese Army. His pointed questions on the army in particular received significant attention.

UML Vice President Thapa prioritized discussions on the army, leaders of the People’s War, and Raswapa over key issues in the policy and program.

“Why does this policy program remain astonishingly silent on the treasonous people who burn the national flag?” he asked amidst opposition from parliamentarians. “Why is this policy and government silent about the unruly behavior of armed groups mocking non-alignment policies?”

Raswapa MP Manish Khanal raised objection to Thapa’s characterization of Raswapa as an anarchic mob during Badal’s address. Speaker Dwijaraj Aryal allowed Badal to continue after his request. Later, MP Khanal urged Badal to respect the dignity of the army and recognize the will of the people expressed through elections.

“You have made statements that bring the Nepalese Army into controversy,” Khanal said. “You called those elected by the people an anarchistic mob. I demand that your entire speech be removed from the parliamentary records.”

Similarly, Rastriya Prajatantra Party MP Khusbu Oli also expressed dissent. “Comments regarding the Nepalese Army are not mere institutional criticism but an assault on national morale,” Oli stated. “This has been ongoing continuously and I deeply regret it. I demand that such statements be expunged from parliamentary records.”

Facing opposition within parliament, Badal was also confronted by journalists with contrasting questions outside the chamber. When asked about rumors that suggested his statements led to UML’s decline amid Oli’s actions, Badal responded:

Badal said, “Because of me, UML will rise further.”

However, the agenda he raised today had been controversial before.

On March 2, at a House of Representatives meeting, Thapa had made similar remarks as the UML parliamentary party leader.

The conclusion drawn on February 3 following the House elections was that the Nepalese Army, government employees, the government led by Sushila Karki, and foreign power centers collectively contributed to UML’s defeat.

Senior UML officials publicly opposed this conclusion. Vice Presidents Vishnu Prasad Paudel and Secretary Yogesh Bhattarai argued that UML could not have reached such a conclusion as suggested by Badal.

Following leaders’ opposition on social media, the UML secretariat convened a meeting on March 4. With party chairman KP Sharma Oli detained, Badal chaired that meeting. The secretariat decided to correct Badal’s statements during this session.

After six hours of discussion, a decision was made to revise Badal’s conclusion in parliament and to hold an election review meeting soon.

However, UML has yet to conduct any meeting to review the election defeat. Chairman Oli, released by Supreme Court orders, is currently resting due to health issues. Vice President Vishnu Prasad Paudel and General Secretary Shankar Pokharel have been pressuring Oli to convene a review meeting.

Although Oli has been reluctant to hold the meeting, Badal, who is close to him, has once again raised the matter as parliamentary party leader despite it having been formally corrected by the party secretariat.

A UML leader suggests that Badal’s stance warrants close examination. “Within UML’s internal conflicts, Badal supports Oli and is engaging leaders who have previously worked with Oli in party restructuring,” he said. “Today’s statements by Badal also reflect this ongoing struggle.”

At the end of March, during a visit to Pokhara, Badal had hinted in this direction. At the March 2 secretariat meeting, Badal’s statements were considered aligned with the party line, and leaders opposing it were labeled right-wing elements according to Oli’s preferences. Thus, the statements Thapa made in parliament had been corrected by the party secretariat before.

However, today in parliament, Thapa reiterated the agenda that UML had already corrected earlier.

Private Sector Casts Doubts on Government’s ‘Investment Express’ Implementation

The government has announced the implementation of ‘Investment Express,’ an automated process, and the Nepal Investment Visa in the upcoming fiscal year’s policy program of 2083/84 (2026/27). Virendra Raj Pandey, President of the Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industry, expressed confidence that granting approvals within 30 days will energize the economy. However, corporate law experts have cautioned that without reforms in outdated laws, these announcements might amount to little more than “showy but ineffective” initiatives. (29 Baishakh, Kathmandu)

Through the policy program for the fiscal year 2083/84, the government has made ambitious plans to attract domestic and foreign investments. The declared measures include implementing ‘Investment Express,’ which promises to complete all processes from business registration to construction permits within 30 days; expanding the “automated process” for foreign investments; and granting “Nepal Investment Visa” to large investors. Nevertheless, industry representatives and corporate law specialists emphasize that reforms to existing laws and improvements in bureaucratic practices are essential to realize these goals.

Virendra Raj Pandey acknowledged that while the 30-day deadline is positive, without legal reforms, the past fate of delays will persist. He stated, “If a feasible project is delayed by a year due to approval procedures, it may no longer be viable. If work is to be completed within 30 days, the necessary procedures and legal tools must be in place.”

Corporate law expert Gauri Shankar Kharel remarked that although the idea of issuing the “Nepal Investment Visa” sounds promising in policy, it is, in practice, just a “showy display with no real substance.” He explained, “Foreign investors face challenges at every step, from company registration to visa procurement and repatriation of profits.” Thus, while the government’s introduction of Investment Express, automated processes, and investment visas represent important starting points for economic reform, the consensus among industrialists and legal professionals is clear: “Without overhauling outdated cumbersome laws, these policies will remain limited to paper, as in previous years.”

Ward Member Dies After Being Struck by Falling Rock in Bajura

April 12, Kathmandu – A female ward member lost her life after being hit by a rock that fell from a cliff in Budhiganga Municipality, Bajura district. The deceased has been identified as 37-year-old Kalpana Devi Thapa, a ward member of Budhiganga–3, according to the Bajura District Police Office.

The incident occurred around 5:30 PM, Inspector Naresh Bahadur Shahi, Information Officer of the Bajura District Police Office, confirmed.

According to Inspector Shahi, Ward Member Thapa of Guingad, Budhiganga–3, was returning home on foot from Falasain Bazaar in Budhiganga Municipality–6 when she was struck by a rock that had fallen from a cliff. Locals informed the police that the rock had pushed her down approximately 50 meters from the footpath to the road below. Inspector Shahi further added that Ward Member Thapa died at the scene. A police team has reached the location and is currently conducting an investigation.

EU Imposes Sanctions on Israeli Settlers and Hamas Leaders in West Bank

European Union (EU) foreign ministers have decided to impose new sanctions targeting Israeli settlers involved in violent activities and senior Hamas leaders in the West Bank. EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell confirmed the decision on Monday, writing on social media platform X, “This is the right time to move from conflict to results; extremism and violence must face appropriate consequences.” The path to implementing these sanctions, which had been stalled for months under Hungary’s previous government, was reopened following a government change last month.

This sanctions package specifically targets three Israeli settlers and four organizations, reflecting deep concern among European governments over the escalating violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. Israel sharply criticized the move, describing the EU’s action as “baseless and politically biased.” Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar condemned the EU, stating, “The European Union’s choice to equate Israeli civilians with Hamas terrorists is reprehensible and a complete distortion of morality.”

The Israeli Prime Minister’s Office also accused the EU of revealing its “moral decline” by making a “false equivalence” between Israeli civilians and Hamas. Meanwhile, senior Hamas official Basem Naim labeled the EU decision as “political deception and discrimination,” expressing dissatisfaction. In an interview with Reuters, he said, “It equates a fascist executioner proud of genocide and ethnic cleansing with the victim side that is defending its security against a state violating international law.”

कस्ता विषयमा गर्दैछन् सांसदले नियमापत्ति ? – Online Khabar

What Happened When MPs Raised Objections Over Procedural Violations?

29 Baishakh, Kathmandu. During the House of Representatives session on Tuesday, four members of parliament attempted to raise objections (called ‘niryamapatti’) alleging violations of parliamentary rules. While two MPs were granted time to speak, two others were denied the opportunity. The incident unfolded as CPN-UML parliamentary leader Ram Bahadur Thapa ‘Badal’ was addressing the house when National Independent Party MP Manish Khanal stood up to raise a procedural objection. Speaker Dol Prasad Aryal (DP) advised that such objections should be raised after the conclusion of the speaker’s remarks. The session proceeded accordingly.

MP Khanal lodged a complaint that some MPs elected by the people were being referred to as a ‘mob of anarchists’ and raised concerns about unnecessary comments on the Nepalese Army, demanding the removal of these statements from the parliamentary record. Following that, Kusbu Oli, chief convener of the Rastriya Prajatantra Party, requested time and was granted it by the Speaker. Oli expressed regret over CPN-UML leader Badal’s comments about the army and also requested that the remarks be expunged from the parliamentary record. However, two other MPs, Parvati Bik of the Nepal Communist Party and Ganesh Karki of the Rashtriya Swatantra Party, were not allowed time to raise objections.

Speaker Aryal told MP Bik, “Procedural objections or pointing out rule violations cannot be made at any time. If you wish to speak out of turn, that is a different matter. However, when raising a procedural objection, one must exercise caution and do so in a timely manner.” Nonetheless, MP Bik did not concede. The Speaker further added, “Honorable member, objections must be raised at the appropriate time. You must study and understand the rules. Previously, those raising objections were allowed to speak, but the issue you are attempting to raise now does not conform to the rules. Please be seated.” Even after this, Bik did not comply. Urging wisdom, the Speaker stated, “I do not want to say more than the dignity of the parliament.” Subsequently, she sat down.

Following this, Rashtriya Swatantra Party MP Ganesh Karki stood up and was given the microphone by the Speaker. As he began to say, “Former speaker Gyan Bahadur Shahi said during his address…,” the Speaker intervened, saying, “Honorable member, if you had raised an objection while Mr. Gyan Bahadur Shahi spoke, I would have granted time. However, you are raising the objection now, after another MP has already spoken. Therefore, I request you to maintain decorum and be seated.” Karki complied reluctantly.

What Are the Rules Regarding Procedural Objections?

Following the Tuesday incident, questions have arisen regarding when MPs are permitted to raise procedural objections in the House of Representatives. Rule 26 of the House Rules addresses this matter. It stipulates, “If any member believes there has been a violation of rules concerning the matter currently under discussion, they may raise an objection by stating the grounds.” To do so, MPs must request permission from the Speaker, and once approved, the member who is speaking must stop to allow the objection to be raised. The member raising the objection may then present their points. Further, Sub-rule 3 of Rule 26 specifies that the objecting member can only speak on matters related to the violation and must then return to their seat. The Speaker’s decision on such matters is final.

However, on Tuesday, two MPs were not granted time to raise objections, prompting debate on whether objections may only be made while a member is speaking or also afterward.

Are There Time Limits for Raising Objections?

According to former Parliamentary Secretariat Secretary Som Bahadur Thapa, a procedural objection refers to a member raising an objection when a statement or action deviates from parliamentary rules. Examples include when an MP speaks off-topic, behaves contrary to procedural conduct, attempts to make decisions by violating rules, or acts contrary to the agenda. Thapa said, “MPs should be alert. While it is appropriate to raise objections during the speech, they may also raise them after the speech if the matter is serious.”

He added that MPs may raise objections not only on statements made on the current day but also on opinions or expressions made on earlier days. “This process serves both as an opposition to the government and as a means to demand answers since the government is continuously accountable,” he explained.

The former secretary emphasized, “A procedural objection is a process based on questions about statements that must logically adhere to parliamentary decorum and practice. All matters become clear after the objection, so it is good practice for the Speaker to seek prior consultation when making decisions. Regarding Tuesday’s incident, the Speaker’s decision cannot be faulted. However, if a member attempts to raise an objection belatedly, time should be allotted.”

Why Should Time Be Given Even After the Fact?

According to the former secretary, parliamentary proceedings are a forum for discussion, argument, and rectification of errors. Procedural objections enable logical questioning and the obtaining of answers.

On What Issues Can Procedural Objections Be Raised?

Rule 20 of the House Rules allows MPs to raise objections when certain procedural norms are violated during the session. The specified rules include:

  • Standing up and showing respect when the Speaker enters;
  • Speaking without the Speaker’s permission or speaking without allocated time;
  • Leaving the chamber without the Speaker’s permission;
  • Speaking on irrelevant topics;
  • Not disturbing while the Speaker is making statements;
  • Keeping phones silent and refraining from phone conversations during the session, among others.

Likewise, Rule 21 outlines the code of conduct for members participating in debates, such as speaking only with the Speaker’s permission, refraining from criticizing the Speaker, avoiding indecent or insulting remarks, and not using unparliamentary language.

Rule 22 governs speaking order and procedures, prohibiting multiple speeches on the same motion without the Speaker’s permission, requiring questions to align with parliamentary decorum, and enabling the Speaker to call a member’s attention if they persistently repeat the same argument, with authority to order a member to stop speaking if necessary.

Furthermore, if required during debate, MPs may request clarifications from the Speaker, but contentious issues should not be raised. By carefully adhering to these rules, MPs can appropriately raise questions and procedural objections in parliament.

Professor Premshanti Tuladhar Awarded the National Mother Tongue Service Award 2082

Professor Premshanti Tuladhar has been honored with the National Mother Tongue Service Award 2082 by the National Indigenous Nationalities Upliftment Institute. Ram Bahadur Thapa, Chairperson of the Indigenous Nationalities Commission, stated at the award ceremony that recognizing individuals contributing to mother tongue languages elevates the respect for these languages. Nima Lama, President of the Indigenous Nationalities Federation, emphasized the need for collective efforts to preserve and promote mother tongue languages.

On 29th Baishakh, in Lalitpur, critic and author of Nepal Bhasa literature and history, Professor Premshanti Tuladhar, received the National Mother Tongue Service Award 2082. At the ceremony held on Tuesday in Lalitpur by the National Indigenous Nationalities Upliftment Institute, Ram Bahadur Thapa, Chairperson of the Indigenous Nationalities Commission, presented Professor Tuladhar with the award along with a cash prize of NPR 100,000.

While addressing the award distribution ceremony, Chairperson Thapa remarked that contributions to mother tongue languages are not made by individuals alone but honoring those contributing enhances the dignity of these languages. “Many distinguished personalities have received this award so far. We must actively cherish and respect mother tongues to maintain the country’s linguistic diversity,” he stressed. He also expressed the need for all ethnic organizations to conduct recognition and award programs in the mother tongue languages themselves. Nima Lama highlighted the importance of such recognition for mother tongue preservation and advancement and called for unified efforts to safeguard these languages and uphold identity.

Identity Cards Now Mandatory for Entry at Rani Border Post, Security Tightened

At the Rani border post in Biratnagar, identity cards are now mandatory for entry into Nepal, and security measures have been intensified. DIG Vinod Ghimire, Chief of Koshi Province Police, reported that heightened vigilance has been implemented along the border areas. Chief District Officer Yubaraj Kattel stated that the requirement for identity cards aims to curb illegal crossings and unlawful activities. (29 Baishakh, Biratnagar)

Local administration has tightened controls for those entering Nepal through the Rani border post in Biratnagar. Following the political shift in West Bengal, India, security at Rani, which serves as an entry point from Jogbani to Biratnagar, has been bolstered. Notably, identity cards have already been mandatory at the eastern Kakarvitta border post.

Increased vigilance has been implemented across all border points adjoining India, DIG Vinod Ghimire confirmed. The heightened surveillance is partly due to concerns that Rohingya refugees may attempt entry into Nepal. “All police units along the border have intensified their watch,” he remarked, “and identity cards are now compulsory for entry into Nepal.”

The political landscape in West Bengal has changed, with BJP leader Shuvendu Adhikari assuming the Chief Minister position, ending Mamata Banerjee’s 15-year governance. Adhikari is known as a staunch Hindu nationalist. Following his appointment, reports indicate that Rohingya refugees—who had sought shelter in West Bengal after fleeing Myanmar via Bangladesh—have begun vacating camps, increasing the possibility of their movement into Nepal, prompting stricter border enforcement.

The Police Headquarters issued a circular directing all districts bordering India to maintain heightened security. Security personnel stationed at border points are also questioning entrants about their purpose of visit. A joint team comprising Armed Police and District Police has been deployed at the border, supported by trained sniffer dogs for security inspections.

Trains from Kolkata arrive at Jogbani every three days, potentially facilitating movement along rail and road routes from West Bengal where Rohingya refugees reside. Police indicate that these routes could be used to enter Nepal, leading to the increased border checks. Chief District Officer Yubaraj Kattel emphasized, “Border security is our routine duty; the enhanced measures aim to prevent unwanted activities and reduce dependence on Indian markets. Identity cards are now mandatory at all border points in Morang district.”

Bangladesh Condemns Israeli Attack After Two Citizens Killed in Lebanon

Two Bangladeshi nationals lost their lives in an Israeli military strike in southern Lebanon. Bangladesh has strongly condemned the attack, describing it as ‘atrocious’ and has urged Israel to exercise restraint and adhere to international law. Kathmandu, April 12.

The Bangladeshi government issued a strong condemnation following the deaths of its citizens in the Israeli assault. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Bangladesh released a statement expressing deep outrage over the incident. The statement read, “Bangladesh condemns in the strongest possible terms the heinous attack carried out yesterday by the Israeli army in southern Lebanon, which tragically resulted in the deaths of two Bangladeshi nationals.”

The victims identified are Shafiqul Islam and Nahidul Islam Nahid, both residents of Satkhira district in southeastern Bangladesh. Bangladesh has reiterated its grave concern regarding the ongoing violence in Lebanon and civilian casualties, urging Israel to demonstrate restraint and comply with international legal standards. The Bangladeshi embassy in Lebanon is coordinating with local authorities to complete the necessary legal procedures to repatriate the victims’ bodies to Bangladesh, the Ministry stated.